Cells driving gecko's ability to re-grow its tail identified

-
A U of G researcher is the first to discover the type of stem cell that is behind the gecko's ability to re-grow its tail, a finding that has implications for spinal cord treatment in humans.

Many lizards can detach a portion of their tail to avoid a predator and then regenerate a new one. Unlike mammals, the lizard tail includes a spinal cord.
Prof. Matthew Vickaryous found that the spinal cord of the tail contained a large number of stem cells and proteins known to support stem cell growth.
"We knew the gecko's spinal cord could regenerate, but we didn't know which cells were playing a key role," said Vickaryous, lead author of the study recently published in the Journal of Comparative Neurology. "Humans are notoriously bad at dealing with spinal cord injuries so I'm hoping we can use what we learn from geckos to coax human spinal cord injuries into repairing themselves."
Geckos are able to re-grow a new tail within 30 days -- faster than any other type of lizard.
In the wild, they detach their tails when grabbed by a predator. The severed tail continues to wiggle, distracting the predator long enough for the reptile to escape.
In the lab, Vickaryous simulates this by pinching the gecko's tail causing the tail to drop. Once detached, the site of the tail loss begins to repair itself, eventually leading to new tissue formation and a new spinal cord. For this study, the biomedical sciences professor, along with PhD student Emily Gilbert, investigated what happens at the cellular level before and after detachment.
They discovered that the spinal cord houses a special type of stem cell known as the radial glia. These stem cells are normally fairly quiet.
"But when the tail comes off everything temporarily changes," he said. "The cells make different proteins and begin proliferating more in response to the injury. Ultimately, they make a brand new spinal cord. Once the injury is healed and the spinal cord is restored, the cells return to a resting state."
Humans, on the other hand, respond to a spinal cord injury by making scar tissue rather than new tissue, he added. The scar tissue seals the wound quickly, but sealing the injury prevents regeneration.
"It's a quick fix but in the long term it's a problem."
"This may play a role in why we have a limited ability to repair our spinal cords. We are missing the key cells types required."
This study is part of a series of investigations into the regenerative abilities of the gecko's central nervous system. The next step is to examine how the gecko is able to make new brain cells, said Vickaryous.
"Geckos are able to regenerate many tissues throughout their bodies, making them ideal models for studying wound healing and tissue re-development. We can learn a lot from them."

Original Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/11/171102120954.htm

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knockout by CRISPR vs Knockdown by shRNA

-
In solving the mystery of gene function, there is no more important clue than the phenotype of inactivating the gene of interest. With a plethora of methods available, researchers must first determine what approach is best for their specific scientific questions and experimental systems. For over a decade, RNA-interference-based methods of gene knockdown (i.e. RNAi & shRNA) have provided a wealth of insight into gene function, but in recent years the advent of CRISPR- and TALEN-based methods now allow genome editing to be used to quickly and efficiently test the effect of gene knockouts. Here, we review the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, and describe some experimental situations in which one approach is better than another, focusing primarily on CRISPR/Cas9 and shRNA. For a discussion of the relative advantages of CRISPR/Cas9 versus TALEN , see our prior Newsletter on this topic. CRISPR Knockout In this method, a guide RNA (gRNA) homologous to an 18-22nt ta...
Read more

Extending Lifespan of Mice, Then Human

-
Image
Invariably, everyone gets old. However, as a true testament to human stubbornness, research toward a “cure” for aging has never stopped. Over the past few decades, various approaches have allowed scientists to generate animal models with extended lifespans. In recent years, this trend has moved from lower organisms to mammalian model systems. There are now several rodent models with enhanced longevity. Many of these models are directly relevant to human aging. A new study has identified a deletion in exon 3 of human growth hormone receptor (GHR) to be prevalent in naturally long-lived men (1). The presence of two copies of this mutation may allow men to live about ten years longer than they otherwise would. This agrees with many findings from rodent models. Transgenic mice that overexpress GH age rapidly, while knockout mice lacking GHR are long-lived (2,3). In humans and mice, IGF1 signaling is also closely linked to longevity via a signaling pathway overlapping that of GH (4,5). ...
Read more

Healing a broken heart

-
Image
Introduction: Reduced heart function due to aging and disease is a major health problem. Heart attacks can have devastating impacts, often leading to the death of the patient or chronic morbidity for those that survive. A major reason for the sensitivity of the circulatory system to heart malfunction is that heart muscle cells (cardiomyocytes) of adult mammals generally do not divide. This means that when a cardiomyocyte dies, due to localized loss of blood supply, for example, that dead cell will never be replaced. Normally, heart tissue has a robust, healthy blood supply, but when a heart attack strikes, portions of heart tissue are deprived of blood flow, resulting in rapid cell death in those sections of the heart. Recovering the ability to heal Interestingly, newborn hearts can heal. In 2011, scientists discovered that newborn mice are able to regenerate cardiomyocytes to repair heart damage, but this ability is lost soon after birth (1). More recently, researchers disc...
Read more